According to an extensive report by the New York Times, Facebook reached agreements with at least 60 different device makers - including companies like Apple, Microsoft, Samsung and Blackberry - providing access to large amounts of user data.
The NYT questions whether these agreements conflict with a 2011 Federal Trade Commission decree that required, among other things, Facebook to, "obtain consumers' affirmative express consent before enacting changes that override their privacy preferences".
What's harder to understand is other aspects of the Times reporting, which found that those hardware companies also had in prior years - and in some cases, continued to have years after those first Facebook data-sharing arrangements were made - the ability to collect much more information from Facebook user accounts including religious affiliation, event attendance and data from the social media accounts of Facebook users' friends.
India’s growth likely topped 7% again in January-March quarter
He said he did not see any correlation between oil prices and GDP growth and the fiscal deficit would remain as per the targets. The country's economic growth was marginally higher at 6.9 per cent in 2016.
Some device makers could retrieve personal information even from users' friends who believed they had barred any sharing, the newspaper said.
In interviews to NYT, Facebook defended its data-sharing agreement and asserted that these are consistent with its privacy policies, the FTC agreement and pledges to users.
Ime Archibong, Facebook's vice president of product partnerships, responded to The Times' article with a blog post titled, "Why We Disagree with The New York Times". Partners could not integrate the user's Facebook features with their devices without the user's permission. Facebook refutes that the APIs shared users' friends' data.
Under scrutiny this time is the company's practice of sharing information about its users with dozens of smartphone and tablet makers.
Sources Expect Bryan Colangelo To Lose Job With 76ers
The source added, unless the perpetrator made some mistakes, it would be hard to definitively prove who tweeted out the information.
In March, Facebook was forced on the defensive after it was revealed that a company that used its platform, Cambridge Analytica, had harvested data in unethical ways for political purposes. To date, Facebook has ended 22 such partnerships with technology companies.
To bridge this gap, we built a set of device-integrated APIs that allowed companies to recreate Facebook-like experiences for their individual devices or operating systems. Facebook released the documents last month, but provided the lawmakers with the name of only one partner - BlackBerry - and little information about how its agreement with the device maker worked.
It said it forged partnerships with around 60 companies back when mobile phones were less powerful and app stores did not yet exist. "This was flagged internally as a privacy issue", Parakilas said, "It is shocking that this practice may still continue six years later, and it appears to contradict Facebook's testimony to Congress that all friend permissions were disabled".
Recent developments surrounding the South China Sea
China has recently shored up its claims to disputed islands and reinforced military bases in both the Paracel and Spratly Islands. The move has been conducted several times in the past three years in defiance of China's claims it owns the disputed territory.
"Over and over Facebook has proven itself unworthy of user's trust".